Ford Ranger 2015 vs Nissan Navara 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 160 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 403 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 40 HP more power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 67 NM more than Nissan Navara. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 6.4 | |
|
The Nissan Navara is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| Nissan Navara gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Ranger is 6 cm longer than the Nissan Navara, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 3`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 31 400 | 19 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |