Ford Ranger 2015 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 50 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi L 200 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Ranger consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Ranger consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.31 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is larger. Ford Ranger is 6 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 5 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1061 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 25 800 | 28 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |