Ford Ranger 2015 vs Land Rover Discovery 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 20 HP more power than Land Rover Discovery, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Land Rover Discovery. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 6.0 | |
|
The Land Rover Discovery is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 375 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 77 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1280 km in combined cycle | |
| Land Rover Discovery gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | |
|
Land Rover Discovery 2016: All wheels are powered permanently, has a center differential. Full time 4WD can be used both on and off road. Transfer cases in most have two modes (low and high), which allows the use of low speed range in harsh conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 4.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.85 m | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1231 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2500 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 31 800 | 20 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Land Rover Discovery has
| |