Ford Ranger 2015 vs Isuzu D-Max 2020

 
Ford Ranger
2015 - 2018
Isuzu D-Max
2020 - 2023
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 3.2 Diesel3.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 200 HP190 HP
Torque: 470 NM450 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a secondsn/a seconds
Ford Ranger engine produces 10 HP more power than Isuzu D-Max, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Isuzu D-Max.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.58.0
Real fuel consumption: 11.0 l/100km10.7 l/100km
The Isuzu D-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford Ranger consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu D-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 75 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Ranger consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu D-Max.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres76 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 940 km in combined cycle950 km in combined cycle
720 km with real consumption710 km with real consumption
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 232 mm (9.1 inches)240 mm (9.4 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 5.36 m5.27 m
Width: 1.86 m1.87 m
Height: 1.82 m1.79 m
Ford Ranger is 10 cm longer than the Isuzu D-Max, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: no data12.5 meters
Gross weight: 3`200 kg3`000 kg
Net weight:1`883 kg1`825 kg
Load capacity:1`317 kg1`175 kg
Ford Ranger load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem more than Isuzu D-Max. Therefore, Ford Ranger is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 23 800no data
Pros and Cons: Ford Ranger has
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
Isuzu D-Max has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv