Ford Ranger 2015 vs Isuzu D-Max 2020
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 10 HP more power than Isuzu D-Max, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Isuzu D-Max. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 10.7 l/100km | |
|
The Isuzu D-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Ranger consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu D-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Ranger consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu D-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.79 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 10 cm longer than the Isuzu D-Max, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.5 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 3`200 kg | 3`000 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Isuzu D-Max has
| |