Ford Ranger 2015 vs BMW X7 2022
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 340 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 700 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 5.9 seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 140 HP less power than BMW X7, whereas torque is 230 NM less than BMW X7. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 8.6 | |
| Ford Ranger consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X7, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.18 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 18 cm longer than the BMW X7, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 2120 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 3`200 kg | 3`325 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 24 400 | 83 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
BMW X7 has
| |