Ford Ranger 2015 vs BMW X7 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 400 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 760 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 5.4 seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 200 HP less power than BMW X7, whereas torque is 290 NM less than BMW X7. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.4 | |
|
The BMW X7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X7, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| BMW X7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.15 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.81 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 21 cm longer than the BMW X7, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 326 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2120 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 3`290 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 31 000 | 93 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
BMW X7 has
| |