Ford Ranger 2015 vs BMW X6 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 400 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 760 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 5.2 seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 200 HP less power than BMW X6, whereas torque is 290 NM less than BMW X6. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.2 | |
|
The BMW X6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| BMW X6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 4.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.70 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 43 cm longer than the BMW X6, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1530 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 3`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 25 000 | 67 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
BMW X6 has
| |