Ford Ranger 2015 vs BMW X5 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 400 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 760 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 5.2 seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 200 HP less power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 290 NM less than BMW X5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 9.3 l/100km | |
|
The BMW X5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Ranger consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Ranger consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 83 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW X5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.75 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 44 cm longer than the BMW X5, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 645 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 3`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 25 400 | 53 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
BMW X5 has
| |