Ford Ranger 2015 vs Audi Q7 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.2 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 470 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 31 HP less power than Audi Q7, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Audi Q7. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.1 | |
|
The Audi Q7 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi Q7, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| Audi Q7 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.06 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.74 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 30 cm longer than the Audi Q7, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 865 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 865 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1925 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.5 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 2`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 31 800 | 56 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Audi Q7 has
| |