Ford Ranger 2015 vs Nissan Navara 2015

 
Ford Ranger
2015 -
Nissan Navara
2015 - 2019
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.2 Diesel2.3 Diesel

Performance

Power: 160 HP190 HP
Torque: 385 NM450 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.8 seconds10.8 seconds
Nissan Navara is a more dynamic driving.
Ford Ranger engine produces 30 HP less power than Nissan Navara, whereas torque is 65 NM less than Nissan Navara. Due to the lower power, Ford Ranger reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.07.0
Real fuel consumption: 9.6 l/100km10.0 l/100km
By specification Ford Ranger consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 150 litres more fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Ranger consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1000 km in combined cycle1140 km in combined cycle
1140 km on highway1330 km on highway
830 km with real consumption800 km with real consumption

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 5.36 m5.30 m
Width: 1.86 m1.85 m
Height: 1.82 m1.81 m
Both cars are similar in size. Ford Ranger is 6 cm longer than the Nissan Navara, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: no data12.4 meters
Gross weight (kg): 3`2003`010
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 30 60019 800
Pros and Cons:
    Nissan Navara has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    • more full fuel tank mileage
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv