Ford Ranger 2015 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 385 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 10 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, but torque is 15 NM less than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford Ranger consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Ranger could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Ranger consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.31 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is larger. Ford Ranger is 6 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 5 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1061 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 31 200 | 29 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |