Ford Ranger 2015 vs Isuzu D-Max 2020
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 385 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 3 HP less power than Isuzu D-Max, but torque is 25 NM more than Isuzu D-Max. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 8.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.9 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Ranger consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu D-Max, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Ranger consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu D-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.79 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 10 cm longer than the Isuzu D-Max, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 3`200 kg | 3`100 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 600 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
| |