Ford Ranger 2015 vs Isuzu D-Max 2020
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 33 HP less power than Isuzu D-Max, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Isuzu D-Max. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 | 8.4 | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu D-Max, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.79 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 10 cm longer than the Isuzu D-Max, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 3`200 kg | 3`100 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`883 kg | 2`055 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 1`317 kg | 1`045 kg | |
| Ford Ranger load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem more than Isuzu D-Max. Therefore, Ford Ranger is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Isuzu D-Max has
| |