Ford Ranger 2015 vs Mitsubishi L 200 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.3 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 385 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 10 HP more power than Mitsubishi L 200, but torque is 15 NM less than Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 9.4 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford Ranger consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Ranger consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi L 200. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.31 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is larger. Ford Ranger is 6 cm longer than the Mitsubishi L 200, 5 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1061 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 31 200 | 29 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Mitsubishi L 200 has
| |