Ford Ranger 2015 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 385 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
| Ford Ranger engine produces 20 HP less power than Volkswagen Amarok, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Volkswagen Amarok. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 7.6 | |
|
The Ford Ranger is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Ranger consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok, which means that by driving the Ford Ranger over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1150 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| Ford Ranger gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.95 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.83 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 11 cm longer than the Volkswagen Amarok, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`200 | 3`040 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 30 600 | 36 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Volkswagen Amarok has
| |