Ford Ranger 2006 vs Honda CR-V 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford Ranger is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda CR-V can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Ford Ranger also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.3 - 4.0 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 84 - 207 HP | 140 - 162 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 - 380 NM | 190 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 - 13.7 seconds | 10.6 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 - 10.2 | 6.7 - 10.1 | |
|
On average, Ford Ranger equipped with diesel engines consume 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is larger. Ford Ranger is 47 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Ranger is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
|
Ford Ranger has more luggage capacity. Ford Ranger has 973 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 2 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Ford Ranger can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`986 | ~ 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |