Ford Ranger 2006 vs Nissan Navara 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ford Ranger is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Nissan Navara is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Ford Ranger is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan Navara can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.3 - 4.0 | 2.5 - 4.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 84 - 207 HP | 144 - 265 HP | |
| Torque: | 195 - 380 NM | 235 - 385 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.5 - 13.7 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 - 10.2 | 8.1 - 13.8 | |
|
On average, Ford Ranger equipped with diesel engines consume 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.08 m | 5.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is smaller. Ford Ranger is 14 cm shorter than the Nissan Navara, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1500 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`986 | ~ 2`489 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |