Ford Ranger 2011 vs Honda CR-V 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.2 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 200 HP | 140 - 162 HP | |
| Torque: | 226 - 470 NM | 190 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 - 12.4 seconds | 10.6 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 - 10.8 | 6.7 - 10.1 | |
|
Ford Ranger petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda CR-V. On average, Ford Ranger equipped with diesel engines consume 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is larger. Ford Ranger is 75 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 7 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1450 litres | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 952 litres | |
|
Ford Ranger has more luggage capacity. Ford Ranger has 923 litres more trunk space than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 2.1 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Ford Ranger can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`200 | ~ 1`910 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |