Ford Ranger 2011 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford Ranger is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volkswagen Amarok can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volkswagen Amarok also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.2 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 200 HP | 122 - 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 226 - 470 NM | 300 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 - 12.4 seconds | 10.1 - 13.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 - 10.8 | 7.2 - 9.6 | |
|
Ford Ranger petrol engines consumes on average 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Amarok. On average, Ford Ranger equipped with diesel engines consume 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 229 mm (9 inches) | 192 mm (7.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Ford Ranger can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.94 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.83 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 11 cm longer than the Volkswagen Amarok, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1450 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Amarok. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`200 | ~ 2`844 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Ranger scores higher in safety tests, but Volkswagen Amarok is better rated in child safety tests. The Ford Ranger scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 400 | 17 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Volkswagen Amarok has
| |