Ford Ranger 2011 vs Toyota Hilux 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.2 (petrol, diesel) | 2.5 - 3.0 (diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 200 HP | 144 - 171 HP | |
| Torque: | 226 - 470 NM | 343 - 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 - 12.4 seconds | 12 - 13.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 - 10.8 | 7.3 - 8.6 | |
|
On average, Ford Ranger equipped with diesel engines consume 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Hilux. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is larger, but lower. Ford Ranger is 10 cm longer than the Toyota Hilux, 4 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1450 litres | 900 litres | |
|
Ford Ranger has more luggage capacity. Ford Ranger has 550 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Hilux. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 13.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 0.5 metres less than that of the Toyota Hilux, which means Ford Ranger can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`200 | ~ 2`717 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 18 600 | 16 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Toyota Hilux has
| |