Ford Ranger 2012 vs Nissan Navara 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Ford Ranger is available with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan Navara can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.2 | 2.5 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 200 HP | 190 - 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 375 - 470 NM | 403 - 550 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 - 12.6 seconds | 9.3 - 11.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 - 10.4 | 8.3 - 9.5 | |
|
On average, Ford Ranger equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.79 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Ranger is 2 cm longer than the Nissan Navara, width is practically the same , while the height of Ford Ranger is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1210 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 13.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 0.6 metres less than that of the Nissan Navara, which means Ford Ranger can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`123 | ~ 2`873 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Ranger scores higher in safety tests, but Nissan Navara is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 20 000 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |