Ford Ranger 2012 vs Ford Ranger 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.2 (diesel) | 2.2 - 3.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with diesel engines. Ford Ranger 2011 is available also with petrol engines. Petrol engines typically offer smoother operation and quicker acceleration compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 200 HP | 150 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 375 - 470 NM | 226 - 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 - 12.6 seconds | 10.3 - 12.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 - 10.4 | 8.3 - 10.8 | |
|
On average, a Ford Ranger 2012 with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Ford Ranger 2011. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.74 m | |
| Ford Ranger 2012 and Ford Ranger 2011 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 1210 litres | 1450 litres | |
|
Ford Ranger 2011 has more luggage space. Ford Ranger 2012 has 240 litres less trunk space than the Ford Ranger 2011. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.7 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`123 | ~ 3`200 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 19 200 | 18 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Ford Ranger has
| |