Ford Ranger 2022 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2022
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford Ranger is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volkswagen Amarok can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Volkswagen Amarok also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol and diesel engines. Ford Ranger is available also with hybrid engines. Hybrid engines offer superior fuel efficiency and reduced emissions compared to conventional engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 - 292 HP | 150 - 302 HP | |
| Torque: | 405 - 600 NM | 350 - 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 - 12.1 seconds | 8.8 - 11.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.2 - 13.8 | 8.3 - 10.3 | |
|
On average, a Ford Ranger with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Volkswagen Amarok. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 226 - 266 mm (8.9 - 10.5 inches) | 217 - 237 mm (8.5 - 9.3 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 2.01 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.89 m | 1.88 m | |
| Ford Ranger and Volkswagen Amarok are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 13 meters | 12.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Amarok. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`276 kg | ~ 3`280 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 2`434 kg | ~ 2`280 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 842 kg | ~ 1`000 kg | |
| Ford Ranger load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem less than Volkswagen Amarok. Therefore, Volkswagen Amarok is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 42 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Volkswagen Amarok has
| |