Ford Ranger 2019 vs Audi A6 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Crossover / SUV | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford Ranger is available only with four wheel (4x4) drive, while Audi A6 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Audi A6 also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 3.2 (diesel) | 2.0 - 4.2 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with diesel engines. Audi A6 is available also with petrol engines. Petrol engines typically offer smoother operation and quicker acceleration compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 - 213 HP | 136 - 350 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 - 500 NM | 280 - 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 - 11.4 seconds | 5.9 - 10.3 seconds | |
| In general, Audi A6 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Ford Ranger. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 9.5 | 5.3 - 11.0 | |
|
On average, Ford Ranger equipped with diesel engines consume 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.35 m | 4.93 m | |
| Width: | 1.89 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.84 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Ford Ranger is larger. Ford Ranger is 42 cm longer than the Audi A6, 3 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 38 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 546 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Ranger is 0.9 metres more than that of the Audi A6, which means Ford Ranger can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`250 kg | ~ 2`224 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 24 800 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Audi A6 has
| |