Ford Ranger 2015 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.2 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 - 200 HP | 140 - 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 - 470 NM | 340 - 580 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 - 14.9 seconds | 7.4 - 13.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 - 8.7 | 7.6 - 8.3 | |
|
On average, a Ford Ranger with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Volkswagen Amarok. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.95 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.83 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 11 cm longer than the Volkswagen Amarok, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`200 | ~ 3`029 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 32 800 | 34 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
| |