Ford Ranger 2015 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2016

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Ford Ranger
2015 - 2018
Volkswagen Amarok
2016 - 2020
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.2 - 3.2 (petrol, diesel)2.0 - 3.0 (diesel)
Both cars are available with diesel engines. Ford Ranger is available also with petrol engines. Petrol engines typically offer smoother operation and quicker acceleration compared to other engine types.

Performance

Power: 130 - 200 HP163 - 258 HP
Torque: 226 - 470 NM400 - 580 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.3 - 14.9 seconds7.4 - 10.9 seconds
In general, Volkswagen Amarok are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Ford Ranger. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.9 - 8.77.8 - 10.9
On average, Ford Ranger equipped with diesel engines consume 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 135 - 237 mm (5.3 - 9.3 inches)192 mm (7.6 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Volkswagen Amarok can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 5.33 m5.25 m
Width: 1.86 m1.95 m
Height: 1.77 m1.83 m
Ford Ranger is 8 cm longer than the Volkswagen Amarok, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no datano data
Turning diameter: no data13 meters
Gross weight: ~ 3`166 kg~ 3`025 kg
Net weight:~ 1`867 kg~ 2`090 kg
Load capacity:~ 1`299 kg~ 935 kg
Ford Ranger load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 28 procentiem more than Volkswagen Amarok. Therefore, Ford Ranger is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads.
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 29 80033 600
Pros and Cons: Ford Ranger has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
  • higher carrying (cargo) capacity
  • lower price
Volkswagen Amarok has
  • only diesel engines available
  • more powerful and dynamic engines
  • higher ground clearance
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv