Ford Ranger 2015 vs Toyota Hilux 2017
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.2 | 2.4 - 2.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 - 200 HP | 150 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 226 - 470 NM | 245 - 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 - 14.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 8.7 | 7.0 - 7.8 | |
|
On average, Ford Ranger equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Hilux. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.33 m | 5.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Ranger and Toyota Hilux are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`166 kg | ~ 2`934 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`867 kg | ~ 1`904 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 1`299 kg | ~ 1`030 kg | |
| Ford Ranger load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem more than Toyota Hilux. Therefore, Ford Ranger is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 800 | 24 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Toyota Hilux has
| |