Ford Ranger 2015 vs Nissan Navara 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ford Ranger is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Nissan Navara can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Ford Ranger also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.2 (petrol, diesel) | 2.3 (diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with diesel engines. Ford Ranger is available also with petrol engines. Petrol engines typically offer smoother operation and quicker acceleration compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 - 200 HP | 160 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 226 - 470 NM | 403 - 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 - 14.9 seconds | 10.8 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 8.7 | 6.4 - 7.0 | |
|
On average, Ford Ranger equipped with diesel engines consume 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Navara. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 135 - 237 mm (5.3 - 9.3 inches) | 600 mm (23.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Navara can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.33 m | 5.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.77 m | 1.81 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Ranger is 3 cm longer than the Nissan Navara, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford Ranger is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.4 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`166 kg | ~ 3`010 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`867 kg | ~ 1`956 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 1`299 kg | ~ 1`054 kg | |
| Ford Ranger load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem more than Nissan Navara. Therefore, Ford Ranger is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 29 800 | 19 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Nissan Navara has
| |