Ford Ranger 2015 vs Lexus LX 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Ford Ranger is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Lexus LX is available only with automatic gearbox. | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ford Ranger is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Lexus LX can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Ford Ranger also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
Engines: | 2.2 - 3.2 (diesel) | 4.5 - 5.7 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 130 - 200 HP | 272 - 383 HP | |
Torque: | 330 - 470 NM | 530 - 650 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 - 14.9 seconds | 7.7 - 8.6 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 - 8.7 | 9.5 - 15.9 | |
On average, Ford Ranger equipped with diesel engines consume 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus LX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.36 m | 5.07 m | |
Width: | 1.86 m | 1.98 m | |
Height: | 1.80 m | 1.91 m | |
Ford Ranger is 30 cm longer than the Lexus LX, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 11 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 701 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1267 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 12.2 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`200 | ~ 3`350 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 32 800 | 102 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
Lexus LX has
| |