Ford Ranger 2015 vs Ford Ranger 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.2 | 2.2 - 3.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 - 200 HP | 130 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 - 470 NM | 330 - 470 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 - 14.9 seconds | 10.6 - 14.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 - 8.7 | 6.9 - 8.9 | |
|
On average, Ford Ranger 2015 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Ranger 2015. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Ford Ranger 2015 and Ford Ranger 2015 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`200 | ~ 3`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 32 800 | 31 800 | |