Ford Ranger 2015 vs Volkswagen Amarok 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.2 | 2.0 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 - 200 HP | 140 - 258 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 - 470 NM | 340 - 580 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 - 14.9 seconds | 7.4 - 13.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 8.9 | 7.6 - 8.3 | |
|
On average, Ford Ranger equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Amarok. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.95 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.83 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 11 cm longer than the Volkswagen Amarok, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 3`200 | ~ 3`029 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 31 800 | 34 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
| |