Ford Ranger 2015 vs Isuzu D-Max 2020
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.2 - 3.2 | 1.9 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 - 200 HP | 163 - 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 330 - 470 NM | 360 - 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 - 14.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 - 8.9 | 8.0 - 9.2 | |
|
On average, Ford Ranger equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Isuzu D-Max. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 232 - 237 mm (9.1 - 9.3 inches) | 240 mm (9.4 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.36 m | 5.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.82 m | 1.79 m | |
| Ford Ranger is 10 cm longer than the Isuzu D-Max, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Ranger is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 13 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 3`200 kg | ~ 3`080 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`997 kg | ~ 1`954 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 1`203 kg | ~ 1`126 kg | |
| Ford Ranger load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 6 procentiem more than Isuzu D-Max. Therefore, Ford Ranger is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 800 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Ranger has
|
| |