Ford Puma 2000 vs Opel Mokka 2020
| Body: | Coupe | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 9.1 seconds | |
|
Opel Mokka is a more dynamic driving. Ford Puma engine produces 27 HP less power than Opel Mokka, whereas torque is 85 NM less than Opel Mokka. Due to the lower power, Ford Puma reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 4.5 | |
|
The Opel Mokka is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Puma consumes 2.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Puma could require 420 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 44 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| Opel Mokka gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Opel Mokka 2020 1.2 engine: Since the timing belt is immersed in oil, it doesn't last the intended 180,000 kilometers, and its wear products clog the oilways. First years of engines have been recalled due to excessive axial play in the ... More about Opel Mokka 2020 1.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.98 m | 4.15 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Ford Puma is smaller. Ford Puma is 17 cm shorter than the Opel Mokka, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Puma is 19 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1105 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Puma is 1.1 metres less than that of the Opel Mokka, which means Ford Puma can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`715 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Puma has
|
Opel Mokka has
| |