Ford Puma 2000 vs Mazda MX-3 1991
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 135 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Ford Puma engine produces 13 HP more power than Mazda MX-3, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Mazda MX-3. Thanks to more power Ford Puma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.4 | |
| Ford Puma consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-3, which means that by driving the Ford Puma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Mazda MX-3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.98 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.31 m | |
|
Ford Puma is smaller, but slightly higher. Ford Puma is 24 cm shorter than the Mazda MX-3, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Puma is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 289 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Puma is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda MX-3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`475 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Puma has
|
Mazda MX-3 has
| |