Ford Puma 2000 vs Hyundai Coupe 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Coupe is a more dynamic driving. Ford Puma engine produces 11 HP less power than Hyundai Coupe, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Ford Puma reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 8.3 | |
|
The Ford Puma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Puma consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Coupe, which means that by driving the Ford Puma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| Hyundai Coupe gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.98 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.31 m | |
|
Ford Puma is smaller, but slightly higher. Ford Puma is 36 cm shorter than the Hyundai Coupe, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Puma is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 362 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Puma is 1 metres less than that of the Hyundai Coupe, which means Ford Puma can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Puma has
|
Hyundai Coupe has
| |