Ford Puma 1998 vs Opel Mokka 2020

 
Ford Puma
1998 - 2000
Opel Mokka
2020 -
Body: CoupeCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.2 Petrol

Performance

Power: 90 HP130 HP
Torque: 122 NM230 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.9 seconds9.1 seconds
Opel Mokka is a more dynamic driving.
Ford Puma engine produces 40 HP less power than Opel Mokka, whereas torque is 108 NM less than Opel Mokka. Due to the lower power, Ford Puma reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.24.5
The Opel Mokka is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Ford Puma consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Mokka, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Puma could require 405 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 40 litres44 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 550 km in combined cycle970 km in combined cycle
670 km on highway1100 km on highway
Opel Mokka gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Opel Mokka 2020 1.2 engine: Since the timing belt is immersed in oil, it doesn't last the intended 180,000 kilometers, and its wear products clog the oilways. First years of engines have been recalled due to excessive axial play in the ...  More about Opel Mokka 2020 1.2 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 3.98 m4.15 m
Width: 1.67 m1.79 m
Height: 1.34 m1.53 m
Ford Puma is smaller.
Ford Puma is 17 cm shorter than the Opel Mokka, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Puma is 19 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data350 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1105 litres
Turning diameter: 10 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Ford Puma is 1.1 metres less than that of the Opel Mokka, which means Ford Puma can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): no data1`715
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 100021 000
Pros and Cons: Ford Puma has
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Opel Mokka has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv