Ford Puma 1998 vs Mazda MX-3 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 122 NM | 137 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Mazda MX-3 is a more dynamic driving. Ford Puma engine produces 20 HP less power than Mazda MX-3, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Mazda MX-3. Due to the lower power, Ford Puma reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 8.1 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Puma is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Ford Puma consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Puma could require 45 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Ford Puma consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MX-3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda MX-3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Mazda MX-3 1994 1.6 engine: This engine is widely regarded as reliable, though it can develop certain issues over time. One of the most common problems is increased oil consumption, often starting after 120,000 km. This is frequently ... More about Mazda MX-3 1994 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.98 m | 4.22 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.31 m | |
|
Ford Puma is smaller, but slightly higher. Ford Puma is 24 cm shorter than the Mazda MX-3, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Puma is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 135 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Puma is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda MX-3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`430 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mazda MX-3 has
| |