Ford Puma 1998 vs Hyundai Coupe 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 122 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Coupe is a more dynamic driving. Ford Puma engine produces 24 HP less power than Hyundai Coupe, whereas torque is 23 NM less than Hyundai Coupe. Due to the lower power, Ford Puma reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Puma is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Ford Puma consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Coupe, which means that by driving the Ford Puma over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Puma consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Coupe. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 40 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 670 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
| 560 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Hyundai Coupe gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.98 m | no data | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Puma is 1 metres less than that of the Hyundai Coupe, which means Ford Puma can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Puma has
|
Hyundai Coupe has
| |