Ford Puma 1997 vs Toyota Paseo 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 1.7 | 1.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 125 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 122 - 157 NM | 130 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 - 11.9 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| In general, Ford Puma are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Toyota Paseo. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 - 7.4 | 7.3 | |
|
On average, the Ford Puma petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Toyota Paseo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.98 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.29 m | |
| Ford Puma is 18 cm shorter than the Toyota Paseo, 1 cm wider, while the height of Ford Puma is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 278 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Puma is 0.2 metres less than that of the Toyota Paseo. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | ~ 1`385 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Puma has
|
Toyota Paseo has
| |