Ford Mustang 2020 vs Mercedes CLK 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 5.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 460 HP | 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 529 NM | 460 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.4 seconds | 5.9 seconds | |
|
Ford Mustang is more dynamic to drive. Ford Mustang engine produces 154 HP more power than Mercedes CLK, whereas torque is 69 NM more than Mercedes CLK. Thanks to more power Ford Mustang reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.7 | 10.9 | |
|
The Mercedes CLK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 520 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| Mercedes CLK gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Mustang is 15 cm longer than the Mercedes CLK, 18 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 408 litres | 435 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLK has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Ford Mustang uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 1.4 metres more than that of the Mercedes CLK, which means Ford Mustang can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`150 kg | 2`115 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`786 kg | 1`585 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 364 kg | 530 kg | |
| Ford Mustang load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 46 procentiem less than Mercedes CLK. Therefore, Mercedes CLK is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 34 000 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |