Ford Mustang 2017 vs Mercedes CLK 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.2 Petrol | 5.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 526 HP | 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 582 NM | 460 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 5.9 seconds | |
| Ford Mustang engine produces 220 HP more power than Mercedes CLK, whereas torque is 122 NM more than Mercedes CLK. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 14.7 | 10.9 | |
|
The Mercedes CLK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 570 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 61 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 410 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| Mercedes CLK gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.82 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Mustang is 17 cm longer than the Mercedes CLK, 18 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 382 litres | 435 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLK has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Ford Mustang uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`115 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 34 000 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |