Ford Mustang 2019 vs Mercedes CLK 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.2 Petrol | 5.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 760 HP | 306 HP | |
| Torque: | 847 NM | 460 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 5.9 seconds | |
| Ford Mustang engine produces 454 HP more power than Mercedes CLK, whereas torque is 387 NM more than Mercedes CLK. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.8 | 10.9 | |
|
The Mercedes CLK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 5.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 885 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is larger, but slightly lower. Ford Mustang is 18 cm longer than the Mercedes CLK, 18 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 382 litres | 435 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLK has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Ford Mustang uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.8 meters | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`115 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 34 000 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |