Ford Mustang 2019 vs Jaguar XK 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.2 Petrol | 5.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 760 HP | 550 HP | |
| Torque: | 847 NM | 680 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 4.4 seconds | |
| Ford Mustang engine produces 210 HP more power than Jaguar XK, whereas torque is 167 NM more than Jaguar XK. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 16.8 | 12.3 | |
|
The Jaguar XK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 4.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XK, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 675 litres more fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.83 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.32 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is larger. Ford Mustang is 4 cm longer than the Jaguar XK, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 382 litres | 330 litres | |
|
Ford Mustang has more luggage capacity. Ford Mustang has 52 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar XK. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`145 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 34 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Jaguar XK has
| |