Ford Mustang 2017 vs Mercedes CLK 2005

 
Ford Mustang
2017 -
Mercedes CLK
2005 - 2006
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 5.0 Petrol5.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 421 HP306 HP
Torque: 530 NM460 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 4.8 seconds5.9 seconds
Ford Mustang is more dynamic to drive.
Ford Mustang engine produces 115 HP more power than Mercedes CLK, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Mercedes CLK. Thanks to more power Ford Mustang reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 12.010.9
Real fuel consumption: 12.5 l/100km10.8 l/100km
The Mercedes CLK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Ford Mustang consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 165 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mustang consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK.
Fuel tank capacity: 59 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 490 km in combined cycle560 km in combined cycle
470 km with real consumption570 km with real consumption
Mercedes CLK gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.78 m4.65 m
Width: 1.92 m1.74 m
Height: 1.38 m1.41 m
Ford Mustang is larger, but slightly lower.
Ford Mustang is 13 cm longer than the Mercedes CLK, 18 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 408 litres435 litres
Mercedes CLK has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, Ford Mustang has 27 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLK. This could mean that the Ford Mustang uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: no data10.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): 1`7322`115
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 34 2004600
Pros and Cons: Ford Mustang has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Mercedes CLK has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv