Ford Mustang 2017 vs Jaguar XK 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 5.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 421 HP | 550 HP | |
| Torque: | 530 NM | 680 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.8 seconds | 4.4 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XK is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mustang engine produces 129 HP less power than Jaguar XK, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Jaguar XK. Due to the lower power, Ford Mustang reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.0 | 12.3 | |
| Ford Mustang consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XK, which means that by driving the Ford Mustang over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 490 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| Jaguar XK gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.32 m | |
| Ford Mustang is 1 cm shorter than the Jaguar XK, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 408 litres | 330 litres | |
|
Ford Mustang has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Ford Mustang has 78 litres more trunk space than the Jaguar XK. The Jaguar XK may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`732 | 2`145 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 38 000 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Jaguar XK has
| |