Ford Mustang 2017 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 4.9 Petrol | 6.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 460 HP | 453 HP | |
| Torque: | 569 NM | 617 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.8 seconds | 4.6 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Camaro is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mustang engine produces 7 HP more power than Chevrolet Camaro, but torque is 48 NM less than Chevrolet Camaro. Despite the higher power, Ford Mustang reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.0 | 12.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.5 l/100km | 12.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Ford Mustang consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro, which means that by driving the Ford Mustang over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Ford Mustang consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 490 km in combined cycle | 560 km in combined cycle | |
| 620 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
| 470 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Chevrolet Camaro gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.78 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.38 m | 1.34 m | |
| Ford Mustang and Chevrolet Camaro are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 382 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.6 meters | |
| Gross weight: | no data | 2`200 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 32 000 | 26 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |