Ford Mustang 2017 vs BMW 4 series 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 421 HP | 184 HP | |
Torque: | 530 NM | 270 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.8 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
Ford Mustang is more dynamic to drive. Ford Mustang engine produces 237 HP more power than BMW 4 series, whereas torque is 260 NM more than BMW 4 series. Thanks to more power Ford Mustang reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.0 | no data | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 60 litres | |
470 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
BMW 4 sērija 2013 2.0 engine: Compared to their predecessors, B48 engines are more robust and less prone to major failures. They are well-suited for chip tuning, which can noticeably enhance performance and responsiveness without ... More about BMW 4 sērija 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.78 m | 4.64 m | |
Width: | 1.92 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.38 m | 1.36 m | |
Ford Mustang is larger. Ford Mustang is 15 cm longer than the BMW 4 series, 9 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 408 litres | 445 litres | |
BMW 4 series has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Ford Mustang has 37 litres less trunk space than the BMW 4 series. This could mean that the Ford Mustang uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 11.3 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`732 | 2`015 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 33 400 | 18 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
BMW 4 sērija has
| |