Ford Mustang 1994 vs Mitsubishi 3000 GT 1995
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 286 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 NM | 407 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 5.9 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi 3000 GT is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mustang engine produces 139 HP less power than Mitsubishi 3000 GT, whereas torque is 115 NM less than Mitsubishi 3000 GT. Due to the lower power, Ford Mustang reaches 100 km/h speed 3.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 12.4 | |
|
The Ford Mustang is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi 3000 GT, which means that by driving the Ford Mustang over 15,000 km in a year you can save 465 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.28 m | |
| Ford Mustang is 4 cm longer than the Mitsubishi 3000 GT, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Ford Mustang is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi 3000 GT. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Mitsubishi 3000 GT has
| |