Ford Mustang 1994 vs BMW 5 series 1996
| Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 NM | 345 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 7.4 seconds | |
|
BMW 5 series is a more dynamic driving. Ford Mustang engine produces 98 HP less power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 53 NM less than BMW 5 series. Due to the lower power, Ford Mustang reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 12.0 | |
|
The Ford Mustang is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that by driving the Ford Mustang over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 790 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.44 m | |
| Ford Mustang is 17 cm shorter than the BMW 5 series, 2 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 460 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 0.7 metres more than that of the BMW 5 series, which means Ford Mustang can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`195 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |