Ford Mustang 1994 vs Toyota Celica 1994
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Ford Mustang is more dynamic to drive. Ford Mustang engine produces 31 HP more power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 138 NM more than Toyota Celica. Thanks to more power Ford Mustang reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 7.9 | |
|
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Ford Mustang could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Toyota Celica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Toyota Celica) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Mustang) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.30 m | |
|
Ford Mustang is larger. Ford Mustang is 19 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 7 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 283 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 1.3 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Ford Mustang can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |