Ford Mustang 1994 vs SAAB 900 1994
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 292 NM | 177 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Ford Mustang is more dynamic to drive. Ford Mustang engine produces 17 HP more power than SAAB 900, whereas torque is 115 NM more than SAAB 900. Thanks to more power Ford Mustang reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 10.9 | |
|
The Ford Mustang is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Ford Mustang consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 900, which means that by driving the Ford Mustang over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 740 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (SAAB 900) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Mustang) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.61 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.44 m | |
| Ford Mustang is 3 cm shorter than the SAAB 900, 11 cm wider, while the height of Ford Mustang is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Ford Mustang is 1.2 metres more than that of the SAAB 900, which means Ford Mustang can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Ford Mustang has
|
SAAB 900 has
| |